The debate over the invention of matches and lighters is indeed an interesting one, and the definitions you’ve provided shed light on the nuances of these inventions. Let’s break down the distinctions:

As you rightly pointed out, the invention of the match in Northern China in 577 AD refers to a form of early matches that were essentially sticks coated with a flammable substance. These sticks were not self-igniting; instead, they required an external flame or sparks to catch fire. In this sense, the match, as defined by the common understanding, was not invented until much later when the self-igniting matchstick, also known as a safety match, was developed in the 19th century.

So, the early Chinese invention can be considered a precursor to the modern match, but it wasn’t a self-contained fire starter. The 16th-century invention you mentioned, involving a converted flintlock pistol, serves as an interesting piece of history. While it’s true that this device was used to create fire, the modern definition of a lighter, as you highlighted, is a mechanical device specifically designed for lighting fires, cigarettes, cigars, or pipes. In this context, the converted flintlock pistol can be considered a primitive form of a lighter, even if it doesn’t align with our contemporary idea of pocket lighters or gas lighters.

In essence, both matches and lighters have evolved over time, with the definitions and functionalities adapting to advancements in technology. The early forms of matches were essentially fire starters, while the converted flintlock pistol can be seen as a precursor to modern lighters. The refinement and standardization of these inventions came much later in history.